Table of Contents
War has remained one of the most costly affairs ever undertaken by any Nation. However, the objectives and the driving force towards a country’s engagement in a war always surpasses the cost considerations, making the country decide to engage in war, regardless of the costs and the risks involved. This is the case with the US military and the NATO forces involvement in fighting the War on Terror in Afghanistan. Nevertheless, if any war has to be fought and won, it calls for more than a mere involvement of the military forces. There is much logistical support necessary for a war to be effectively executed (Harris, 2011). It therefore follows that in addition to the involvement of the military forces, the involvement of other departments as well as the civilians is key towards successfully strategizing and executing a planned war.
The logistical services offered to the military by the departments and civilians range from intelligence information, to supplies and resources. Therefore, without the support of other departments and contractors, it would be virtually impossible for any war mission to be executed successfully (Powers, 2012). In light of this, the logistical interaction between L3 Communications and the US Military comes into focus.
There has been a great interaction between L-3 Communications and the US military in a bid to liberate and establish a democratic nation for Afghanistan. The interaction is in form of logistical support, where L-3 Communications assists in the flow of supplies, information, and resources from the US to Afghanistan, as the destination. The logistical interaction between L-3 Communications and the US occurs in various forms.
Support Offered By L-3 Communications to the Us Military
Maintenance of supplies is one of the key logistical supports offered by L-3 communications to the US Military. While fighting on the battlefront could be instrumental in winning war against the enemy, maintenance of constant and uninterrupted supplies is the most vital aspect (Gen & William, 2004). Under this aspect, L-3 communication plans for the maintenance of inventory through the provision of warehousing facilities for all the necessary equipments and resources to be supplied to the US military. In addition to inventory management, L-3 also plans for the transportation of the supplies from the warehousing destination to the destination where the US military is launching their offensive war on terror in Afghanistan.
An army offensive without sufficient supplies and transport is bound to fail in their mission (Powers, 2012). It is under this task that L-3 manages how and when the supplies are to be transported to the US military destination, paying attention to any risk of attack that might occur in the process of transporting the supplies, and still ensuring the required supplies are delivered in good time. Therefore, L-3 plans on the procurement of supplies, paying attention to deterioration of such material supplies, as well as, predicting on the future demand that might arise and thus catering for such (Woodward, 2006). Thus, L-3 undertakes constant information gathering from the Military destination, liaising with them on the required supplies and arranging on when they should be availed.
Command and control is the other form of logistical support offered by L-3 communications to the US military. Under this form of support, L-3 offers direction to the US military based on the intelligence information it has gathered, regarding the whereabouts of the enemy in attack, their strategies, and plans, as well as the nature of their weaponry and other war equipment (Hodge, 2010). L-3 uses personnel and communication equipments to coordinate the forces in their war destination, through the provision of staff officers who coordinate between the commanding officers and the forces on the ground. With the assistance of these staffs, the military is in a position to plan and execute their attacks precisely, enabling them to defeat their enemies (Gen & William, 2004).
Another aspect of logistical support offered by the L-3 to the military is the intelligence information assessment and gathering (Powers, 2012). The L-3 personnel are involved in gathering information regarding the US military targets through either being on the ground or through the communications facilities. The timeliness and accuracy of such information gathered is of great importance in that it enables the military prepare their attacks well and execute them way before their enemies have undertaken any major step towards the offensive. Intelligence assessment can also occur through electronic communication intercept, where the L-3 personnel can intercept the communication of the target enemy in the war zone, get the clue of the plans and strategies, and then convey the same to the military command. This is essential in helping the military prepare to repulse the attack planned by the enemy or even plan a counter attack (Woodward, 2006). Through the offer of this support, L-3 indentifies intercepts and locates the enemy communications and signals, in a bid to detect any threat and plan for future operations (Harris, 2011).
Through the application of military deception techniques, the L-3 personnel can deceive the enemy through deception tactics, which can lead them to the area of a prepared ambush attack (Woodward, 2006). They can also send fake signals that would mislead the enemy on the whereabouts of the US military, allowing the military to execute an attack (Powers, 2012). More to the logistical support is the offer of surveillance that L-3 provides to the US military. This involves monitoring the activities of the target enemies, their where about, as well as, the protection of all communication and information channels through which the enemy can gain an informed advantage regarding the planned attacks. This surveillance can be undertaken both physically through monitoring the enemy and their activities on air or water, or even on land.
Alternatively, electronic means can be applied to track down the enemy and their movements, as well as any relevant information (Hodge, 2010). This monitoring can be applied through computer surveillance, where the data and information flow through the Internet is noted and analyzed, to clearly track the details and its intended purposes. This way, any communication by the target enemy over the internet can be tracked and thus appropriate action taken against in readiness for either defense or attack. Real time communication taping over telephone can also be the other form of surveillance where communication through voice or texts can be taped and assessed for intelligence purposes (Woodward, 2006).
Camera and aerial surveillance also serves as other forms of logistical support that L-3 communications offers to the US military. Under this form of surveillance, camera and video devices are mounted on physical structures, radars, or aircrafts to monitor all the activities being undertaken in specified areas and transmit the video footage to a center where designated personnel are physically monitoring it (Gen & William, 2004). This goes a long way in helping the US military gain information regarding the location of their enemies and the activities ongoing thus helping them prepare for the appropriate actions. Owing to the nature of war strategies existing in present day, it would be virtually impossible to engage in any war without such logistical support, in that going to the battlefront and engaging the enemy is no longer the main war strategy. With sufficient information and intelligence regarding the enemy, it would be easier to overcome the enemy than being mightier on the battlefront (Powers, 2012).
The L-3 integrated systems group offers a range of logistical support services to the US military, which includes design, maintenance, modification, and repair of their aircraft and other war facilities to ensure they are in perfect working conditions and have the necessary devices and systems for data collection and special missions such as surveillance and spying (Hodge, 2010). With the provision of such integrated system services, the US military is set to execute its warfare against the enemy without the fear of disruptions or failure of its weaponry, communication services, or supply chains. It also offers contracted field services to the US military on the war destination, where the L-3 communications technicians and Engineers travel to the war zone and undertake the repair, maintenance and modification services required on the aircrafts, warships or the ground vehicles used by the US military (Harris, 2011).
This serves to ensure there is always effective and efficient means of transport and suitable war facilities, keeping the dangers and risks associated with equipment breakdown and dysfunction on the warfront at bay. L-3 also offers inspection and contingency services to the military, ensuring there are no disruptions in the planned offensives because of any failures related to the facilities and equipment for use on the warfront (Gen & William, 2004). Depending on the needs of the military regarding surveillance and intelligence assessment, L-3 contracted field services can communicate and navigate devices on the aircrafts, warships, or ground vehicles on the war zone, without the need to take such facilities back home for such installations. This serves to offer convenience in the execution of war strategies based on the conditions on the ground. The effect of this is that the plans and strategies laid down by the military are not interrupted because of inconveniencies (Hodge, 2010).
In further provision of logistical support to the US military, L-3 provides military training and education to soldiers, for new missions, based on the changes occurring on the war requirements each day. Through such training, the soldiers are exposed to new techniques and strategies, as well as adaptive tactics based on ethical and moral principles (Powers, 2012). L-3 offers on-the ground training based on the response to new world conflicts thus equipping and enhancing the soldiers to be competent in their missions. The training is offered to the soldiers on the warfront, such as training those deployed to fight terror war in Afghanistan. This allows the soldiers to test the skills and training on the real terrains, thus testing the appropriateness of their skills for application in any war (Woodward, 2006).
On top of training services for the soldiers, L-3 offers linguists services to the US army, which comprises of the interpreters and the translators (Powers, 2012). This is a vital service, in that, considering that the US military is involved in war in Afghanistan, where they do not speak the same language as the residents or the terrorists, such services are inevitable (Harris, 2011). This because, they enable the military to keep informed on all the activities on the ground as well as collect intelligence information pivotal for the war on terror. Through such services, the military can understand what communication is going on amongst the residents of the war zone as well as war captives instrumental in giving valuable information leading to victory (Hodge, 2010). Because hiring linguist services is a sensitive issue in that they can work for the enemy through giving wrong impressions and interpretations, the US military should enlist the services of a trusted partner such as L-3 communications (Powers, 2012).
With respect to the two organization’s policies and procedures, there is a comparison. The similarity is mostly identifiable in the guiding principles for the two organizations. Most notable is the fact that the principle of integrity is a significant guiding principle for both organizations, owing to the fact they operate in a very sensitive and risky field, where integrity and trust are not options (Harris, 2011). There has to be a well-build mutual understanding and trust between the organizations and amongst their members. The soldiers have to be fully committed to the defense of their country and its interest whereas the L-3 employees have to be fully committed to meet the requirements of the US military logistical support (Gen & William, 2004).
Another comparison is the emphasis placed on the principle of excellence by the two organizations. It is apparent that any mistake or failure to deliver or perform as expected in this field is a very risky and costly issue (Powers, 2012). Therefore, for the success of the mission in which the two organizations are involved, excellence and competency must be upheld at all times. It is through excellence and competency that any mission embarked by the US military can be successfully accomplished with the logistical support from L-3 Communications (Harris, 2011).
While the procedures and policies for the two organizations compare almost completely, there is a point of contrast. Regardless of the fact that both organization are working towards accomplishing the mission embarked by the US military, the only contrast is in their real identities. While the US military is a state entity tasked with the duty of protecting and defending the country, L-3 communications is a business entity, cooperating with the state in the provision of requisite services towards the protection and defense of the country’s interests (Gen & William, 2004).
The involvement of the US military on a war alone is not enough to accomplish the mission for which a war is fought. The logistical support offered by L-3 is pivotal in enabling the successful execution of the war. The logistical support offered ranges from intelligence assessment, procurement, maintenance, and delivery of supplies as well as offering other support services such as linguists. Thus, even though the role played by L-3 in logistical support may not be conspicuous, it is instrumental in the achievement of US military warfare success. The two are similar in many ways, such as aiming for excellence and different in some others, such as different legal entities. However, they collaborate for the best of the US military.