Society consists of various separate cultures. On a global scale, all the societies combine and form one big society that is called “the human race”. The latter should be explored taking into account the fact that its constituents are very different. The protection of each of those separate cultures is of high importance and it can be achieved with a help of nationalism. Modern world encourages the principles of freedom of speech and democratism. The right to freely manifest the feelings of pride for one’s nation is inseparable from that point of view. If we can advocate our standpoints as for the freedom of rights, then we should also respect the range of nationalistic ideas that exists in today’s world. These ideas have to be recognized, since they are the originative suggestions that are aimed at the preservation of the uniqueness of every separate society of the world. The constitution of our country denounces any display that is discriminating group of people or an individual ith regard to their cultural, ethnic, or religious backgrounds. Although everyone should be allowed to show patriotism for their nations, the sharp edge between expressing nationalism and discrimination towards other nations should be considered as well.
The nature of imperialism
In the 1880s, certain conditions made European expanse as easily achieved as is had never been before. The greater wealth was mobilised more effectively, and communications, medicines, and arms were all improved. Almost every imperialist nation with a huge number of poor people enjoyed the feeling of being superior. Europeans believed they were bringing civilisation to the savages. For the French, this was a “civilising mission” to the rest of the world, and for the British, in Rudyard Kipling’s words, it was the “white man’s burden” to take European government and culture to the Asians and Africans.
However, those were mainly the Europeans who enjoyed the advantages. As for the indigenous people, their land was expropriated, and they were often forced into labour. African farmers could not compete with large commercial white farms. Indian industry ended its existence because of the British trade laws. Many farmers lost their ability to feed themselves because they were forced to grow cash crops.
The violence that was used to take control of the territories led to the huge numbers of deaths. Plantation farming involved the forcible movement of people from one area to another, and often, the ensuing mix of cultures did not go smoothly. The vast majority of colonies depended on the manufacturing of a restricted amount of raw material, since the policies of the colonists did not give their colonies to enlarge their own export base. However, colonialism had certain benefits for the conquered territories. The colonial powers built new communication and transportation systems, established universities, and introduced the latest medical novelties. Colonial rule also ended local wars in the numerous lands.
Nevertheless, this was only a minor compensation for the almost slavery conditions that many native peoples had to endure. In addition, as public health improved, the population grew at a rapid pace, which resulted in an abundance of labourers competing for a small number of jobs and a growth in unemployment.
King Leopold's ambitions
King Leopold’s desire to capture Congo explains the well-known saying “That it is not what you know but who you know” and reformulates it further as “It is not what you believe but how you can persuade others to believe in what you believe”. King Leopold held his enormous power from the state that seemed rather isolated by marking and exploiting the pivotal figures to repeat his wrong purpose as well as hide from publicity his notorious ideas. In most cases, the King of Belgium realized this relationship with a help of encouraging the covert plans of the possible allies with admirable monitorial power that was hidden in the behind the humane illusion. During the history of a world, the colonizational process and savage usurpation have been justified referring to the God’s will and the necessity to civilize the barbarians. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the real reasons of subjecting one country to another’s rule is mainly explained by the craving for authority and the money. Each explorer, diplomat, senator, parliament member, and businessman adheres to this.
The loftier goals of the Congo yet displayed vigorous support when these goals paralleled self-interests. King Leopold, as a faithful utilitarian, used everyone, since his value made him an exile in the end. However, the person who provided the most discrediting facts about the King was no one other than his own follower, Kowalsky. He averted his alliance when he concluded his self-interest to lie elsewhere.
With these human nature monuments, power, money, and prestige, sought after the sanctity of life, become overwhelmingly negated. Power spoils, and an absolute power spoilsabsolutely. This famous adage quote concludes the Congo’s collapse. To control a man’s destiny, the power is needed, but to control the destiny of a whole nation, a sense of omnipotent mastery is required. King Leopold supposed that his deeds should be justified at least for that reason that his will encompassed somewhat of a “deity’s” origins. His desire for an enourmous power was somewhat of an infection that spread over his Congo Empire like a disease. The simple thought of superiority justified the means of suppression. In Congo, white men in power defined morality as based on the lucrativeness and usability.
A similar phenomenon remains in the fact that the individuals and countries, as a whole, essentially ignore the common faults they hold with others while seeking for removed transgressions to condemn in others. This dark side of a mankind prospers in leaps and bounds since the beginning of a human’s existence, and the very King Leopold’s example suggests the idea that dissimilar means incorrect and incorrect justify suppression and/or correction. Virtually every power of the world, at one time or another, committed similar atrocities. What each of them cannot recognize results in Shepord’s, Casement’s, and a few other’s point, and the colonies were civilized just slightly differently than the colonizers not inferior to. The game of it all means finding by every state where the others vary, finding the spec, as well as exclaiming their inborn rage. Through the game each achieves profit and false moral predominance.