Religious imagery is an important part of religion that enhances the use of images, symbols and sculptures to convey messages (Abdullahi, 1985). It is important, because it enhances a deeper understanding among believers. A good example is how Christians use the image of Jesus to portray His suffering in order to redeem sinners. It reaffirms their faith that they will have eternal life.
Albert Camus was a renowned author. He wrote several books that were highly acknowledged globally. It is because in his works, he emphasizes all aspects of life (Cheri, 2002). These include issues starting from politics to religion. While writing his books, he was touched by the work done by religious people. In particular, it is vivid in the book Saint Augustine. This article about Augustine was connected with the issue of repentance. This aspect drew attention of Albert. As a result, he decided to write around thirteen books referring to Saint Augustine (Cheri, 2002). According to Camus, the latter was a spiritual leader, who encouraged people to go to church and seek repentance. Another aspect that impressed Camus was the message of forgiving others. Religion promoted the link between Jesus and the entire world. Camus later acknowledged that his ideas about religion were influenced by his personal experience relating to Saint Augustine. At one point, Camus publicized that people, who lacked religious beliefs, were deprived of inspiration to get salvation.Want an expert to write a paper for you Talk to an operator now
Frantz Fanon was influenced by a variety of thinkers. These included Sartre and followers of Marxism. They contributed to his work greatly (Cheri, 2006). He looked how culture and violence impacted the liberation of a country. The author emphasized the importance of third world countries in handling their problems without depending on the western world. Due to poor translation, his work was misinterpreted by many people. It was because there were many omissions and errors in the translation. As a result, he was perceived to encourage violence, which was against human dignity. However, this was not the case, as he had been encouraging the minority to refute discrimination. Thus, Fanon had a great concern about minority individuals (Abdullahi, 1985). He encouraged more force to be used in Algeria against colonialists. Thus, the work of Fanon was similar to that of Simone.
Just like Fanon, Jean-Paul Sartre was also involved in wars either directly or indirectly. He started his career as an author. Initially he was a meteorologist in the French army. Later, he founded a small army together with de Beauvoir (Cheri, 2006). Sartre was a great resistor and engaged in a lot of wars in France. He published many literature works, where he pointed out that all would be done to ensure that peace and stability prevailed in Paris. In fact, Sartre was described as a person of great resistance and disregard to humans. It was aimed to save himself from external forces on the part of other countries, such as Germany. In fact, wars, in which Sartre engaged, influenced his writing. Being at the warfront, he wrote a lot of books that gave a real picture of the situation on the ground.
Existentialism was always the word of satire. Sartre believed in God’s existence. As much as he engaged himself in violence, it was just for protection from enemies (Sartre, 1956). Both Sartre and Camus are seen as great resistors to external forces in their countries. However, the extent, to which Sartre resisted, was massive. It is seen when Fanon acknowledges that Sartre is the greatest resistor. These two personalities have the same principles of self-protection.
Another author, who was has also gained a lot of recognition, is Simone De Beavoir. She was an activist and social theorist, supporting female existentialism (De Beuvoir, 1946). She was similar to Sartre in that aspect. Simone wrote a lot of articles regarding respect to fellow humans. Her work was based on the principles contained in the nibble of this aspect.
Simone also emphasized the importance of men respecting women. She had great respect for a human life and encouraged it between the genders (Cheri, 2006). She said men disrespected women to such an extent that they failed to understand problems, through which women were undergoing. She was also keen to notice that discrimination was witnessed on the basis of gender and races. However, Simone’s overall emphasis was put on injustices done to women. She related them to emanate from history. However, because of her respect for humans, she said that women were equal to men. It meant that they could do the same duties as men did. This message discovered a new reality to men. The outcome was that women gained significant recognition in France. In fact, when she died, more women attended her burial ceremony because of the work she had done.
Simone De Beauvoir could have opposed the great resistance of Sartre. It is because that resistance led to death of humans (De Beuvoir, 1946). In addition, the most affected were women, about whom Simone de Belvoir had a great concern. It is because in any war, women and children are the most affected.
In summary, these authors share some similarities and differences depending on the values of a person. However, liberation and the excessive use of force was applied in some instances by some of them. It does not mean that they liked war, but they tried to protect their territories. It happens even in Christian communities. Thus, war is seen to restore sanity in affected populations.