Bias and discrimination have been common in the criminal justice system for many years. The minority groups by virtue of race and sex have continued to experience unjust treatment in the criminal justice system (Pollock, 2012). The criminal justice system should implement various strategies to address incidents of bias and discrimination. Staffing criminal justice agencies by representatives of their own communities may address bias and discrimination due to differences in race, gender, sexual orientation, age, ethnicity, just to mention a few. The criminal justice system should assign indigenous people and representatives of ethnic minorities a fundamental role in designing programs, implementation of the programs, and governance (Pollock, 2012). This is significant for various corrections, such as prisons, jails, probation and parole. Like other approaches, this approach has its own weaknesses and strengths.
Buy Bias and Discrimination essay paper online
The approach of staffing criminal justice agencies by representatives of their own communities may exhibit strengths and weaknesses while dealing with bias and discrimination. When the criminal justice system officials deal with offenses among the people who belong to their own communities they will not practice bias and discrimination based on race and ethnicity (Pollock, 2012). Therefore, this can be an effective strategy to deal with disproportionate presentation of the minority races and ethnic groups. However, this strategy of staffing criminal justice agencies with indigenous people may not address the bias and discrimination on the grounds of gender, age, and sexual orientation (Pollock, 2012). This strategy cannot be effective in communities with people who belong to different races. It is evident that this strategy cannot significantly lessen bias of practitioners in criminal justice system.
In conclusion, the criminal justice system may not depend on a strategy of staffing criminal justice agencies by the indigenous people to lessen bias and discrimination. This is because the strategy fails to address bias and discrimination based on age, gender, and sexual orientation differences (Pollock, 2012). These differences may be common within the community to which the criminal justice officials belong.