• Order now
    •  

      Toll-Free Numbers

      Call me back Live Support
Free «Was Justice Served» Essay Sample

Dick Tracy used the latest technology in apprehending the criminals he pursued. He was following up the works of the criminals who were led by the Big Boy Caprice also known as Al Pacino. The criminals are taking over small businesses in the city, and this leads to the killing of Lips Manlis, a club owner, by Big Boy Caprice. Big Boy is arrested, but later released because he could not be indicted. It happened after the investigation by Dick Tracy and the refusal of Breathless to testify. Tracy is arrested, but later released after it was revealed that Breathless killed John Fletcher (Roberts, 2003). Justice is found after Big Boy and the Blank, who ended up being Breathless, are killed. Tracy, his girlfriend Tess and the kid survive.

The criminals led by Big Boy Caprice conducted their activities through killing various people. It was only justified for the criminals to be answerable for the crimes they committed. Although Big Boy Caprice was arrested and later released, his death compensated for his actions. The criminal activities of Breathless and her hypocrisy led to her death. Thus, these criminals deserved to pay for their actions (Roberts, 2003).

Buy Was Justice Served essay paper online

Title of your paper
Type of assignment
Pages
-
+
Academic level
Timeframes
Spacing

* Final order price might be slightly different depending on the current exchange rate of chosen payment system.

Currency
  • Total price
  •  
 
Continue to order
 

Here is a difference between civil justice and moral justice, although there are some similarities. The criminal activities of the gangs to take over the small business in the city were both against the civil laws and the moral and ethical justices. In this story, there was no difference between civil and moral justice as the crimes were not acceptable in either civil or moral justice (Roberts, 2003).

In the story, Dick Tracy knew the criminals and wanted the justice to triumph. He facilitated the arrest of Big Boy Caprice, although he was released later because of lack of evidence. Breathless refused to testify against Big Boy because they were both criminals.

Sherlock Holmes

The arrest and sentencing to death of killer Lord Blackwood indicates that there was intention to obtain justice towards criminals in this story. However, justice was attained it the end because Blackwood, who was the killer, finally dies, whereas his ally Lord Coward is arrested after their plan to kill people in parliament failed (Surhone & Timpledon, 2010). Justice is also realized when Luke Reordan is killed. It happened is because Reordan was behind the criminal activities committed by Blackwood.

Want an expert to write a paper for you
Talk to an operator now
 

It is evident that the criminals in this story received what they deserved. Although it is not clear what happened to Lord Coward after he was arrested, Luke Reordan and Blackwood received what they deserved. Considering that Blackwood was destined for death, but escaped through magic, his death at the Tower Bridge was justified.

The stipulated civil laws as seen in this story called for killing of criminals convicted of murder. Actually, it was not morally and ethically to kill. The criminals facilitated death of many people, which was immoral. Thus, it calls for them to pay for their actions. Although the punishment in civil justice may not equal the punishment in moral justice, both end up punishing the criminal (Surhone & Timpledon, 2010).

In the film, the London detective Sherlock Holmes and his partner Watson are detained to prevent Blackwood, who has already killed five women, from killing more people. Inspector Lestrade did justice by ensuring that Blackwood is arrested and sentenced to death. Holmes and Watson are determined to ensure that criminals are brought to justice. Through the assistance of Adler, they are able to prevent the killing of innocent people in parliament.

The Maltese Falcon

In the film, it is unclear who killed Thursby, Captain Jacobi, and Archer. Spade (Humphrey Bogart), who is a private investigator, also does not know who killed those people. A man, who was following Wilmer earlier, initially implicates him. He later accuses Brigid, formerly known as Ruth, of killing Archer in order to implicate Thursby, who was her unwanted accomplice. Spade implicates Gutman and Cairo, as well as, Brigid who are apprehended and arrested by police (Luhr, 1995). It is worth noting that justice was not done, because there was no evidence, and Spade went scot free, despite the fact he had an affair with Archer’s wife. 

In the film Maltese Falcon, the criminals who killed Thursby, Captain Jacobi, and Archer are unknown, and possibly they escaped free. Spade, the main criminal in the story implicates other people, but ends up free. He does not, therefore, receive the punishment he deserves.

 
 
Special offer for new customers!
Get 15% OFF
your first order

The difference between civil, ethical and moral justice is obvious in this story. The eccentric behavior of Spade goes unpunished in the civil justice. Lieutenant Dundy knew that Spade had an affair with Archer’s wife, but he was not punished. This was punishable and immoral in ethical and moral justice (Luhr, 1995).

In the film, it is evident that justice was not done. The killers were not found, and the arrests were based on suspicion. Spade, who was entrusted with investigations of the killings, did not do justice (Luhr, 1995). He was involved in a scheme to acquire the Falcon, but it did not succeed. He ends up implicating Gutman, Cairo, and Brigid unfairly.   

The Rear Window

The confession of Thorwald that he killed his wife is enough indication that his arrest was justified. It was the efforts of Jeff Jeffries (James Stewart), his wife Lisa and homecare nurse Stella, who worked tirelessly to ensure that the criminal was brought to justice. Although New York police detective Tom Doyle did not find any crime, it was evident that later James Stewart was able to convince him (Woolrich, 2001).

The intention of Thorwald was to kill his wife who was bedridden and concealed the secret. He succeeded in doing that, but only for a short time. His tricks were known later and the police arrested him. The criminal did not achieve his mission of killing his wife secretly.

It is clear, according to the story, that it was unethical and immoral to kill. It also clear that it was illegal because Jeff called in a detective from New York to investigate what was going on. It was also a civil wrong and punishable by law (Woolrich, 2001). In the film, murder is a punishable crime in both the civil and moral justice. It is illegal morally to commit murder and it is against the law.

The endeavors of Jeff, Stella, and Lisa were justified as they were seeking justice for Thorwald’s wife. Jeff’s intention and objective was to ensure that Thorwald was arrested and charged for murdering his wife. Jeff did what was just for Thorwald.

It is clear from the four films that justice is served in most cases. However, despite the suffering victims, many crimes went unpunished and justice was not served. All in all, justice was served in Dick Tracy, Sherlock Holmes, and The Rear Window, but was not served in Maltese Falcon. All the four stories provide evidence for civil, ethical, and moral justice.

   

What our Clients say

Read all testimonials
Close
 
 
Get 15%OFF   your first custom essay order Order now Prices from $12.99 /page
X
Click here to chat with us