Table of Contents
For many years, there has been a lot debates about whether college athletes deserve to be paid or not. A number of people consider that a scholarship should be a sufficient fee. Today, scholarships can be very valuable and lead to a profession after college that is worth a million dollars or more in a lifetime. In addition, student athletes obtain all kinds of benefits as they are being educated. This can include additional coverage for books, housing, and other college related expenses. However, it is the actuality of college sports that they generate millions of dollars for colleges (Mondelloa, Piquerob & Leeper, 2010). Different scholars address this matter in different ways. There is also the question of whether it is ethical or not. College is for an education, but not for generating an excessive amount of income by playing sports. If athletes are truly hurt for the money, they should accumulate the money they receive from summer jobs, and save what they make for the school year. There are limitations with employment for athletes during the school year, which can prevent employment. While non-athlete students find ways to make money during the school year, so athletes can do the same.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the need and possibility for college athletes to be paid.
Compensation packages will give college athletics more advantages for their plans than the traditional scholarships which include room and board.
The present research was based on the methodology of a systematic search of essential publications in professional journals, government agencies, and precise books. However, it was not a comprehensive literature review due to the resource and time constraints.
Definition of terms
The following terms and their combinations were used to identify key publications in the search engine of the main electronic scientific databases: “ProQuest”, “APEJ search”, “Royal Anthropological Institute”, “Taylor & Francis”, “Social Science Research Network”, and “OCLC.” All reviewed publications came from electronic databases of EBSCOhost and LexisNexis Academic database.
Inclusion, Exclusion, and Assessment
The search method covered papers published from 2005 to 2012. All results were extracted from studies conducted in the USA. Publications only in the English language were considered. The search was also limited to primary research articles, reports, and publications from the US government. Unpublished studies were not included in the current review.
According to Lane, Nagel, and Netz (2012), it has been claimed that several student athletes come from backgrounds, where the learning system is not high quality. The school regions are under-funded and unsuccessfully handled. For numerous student athletes, their approach is learning with complete athletic scholarships. A game is their future, and student athletes merely focus on athletics throughout. Therefore, at what time money is hanging of the faces in front of a number of student athletes, the enticement must be overpowering. If athletes obtain scholarships of college thus, they may be paid, but players are paid, so people think, from the university, they have college athletes graduate because there could be a powerful motivation to strive in the class. More colleges and main universities pay coaches for students’ performance and the players should be paid as healthy. In addition, student athletes have no control over their identity. They personally have no right to enter into sponsorship agreements, which can benefit them, but the universities can reflect on that college player. Ultimately, the students-athletes sign over their rights of publicity, in a sense, to the universities (Mueller, 2004).
Mondelloa. Piquerob and Leeper (2010) note that the public perceptions study on paying student athletes has reported that, if athletes’ players will be paid then this bribery would be stopped. No additional college players advertising their shoes, no prompts to pay additional players and no more college players have attractive jobs that are paid heavy money immediately for little hours. For a student-athlete, is very hard out there. An investigator also said that, non-student athlete may obtain a work to make additional wealth and are able to get approximately their plans. Moreover, student-athlete may not obtain a career waiting the educate year is in excess of and also there are limits on the jobs type so, they can get. In the athletics of college, the regulations are not fair-haired students and the performing field is not identical to disburse the players (Mondelloa, Piquerob & Leeper, 2010).Want an expert to write a paper for you Talk to an operator now
The payment intended for student athletes is their education. Adler spent five years monitoring systematic information about athlete’s that live in a major college program. The time spent interviewing, observing and traveling with these athletes they were able to conclude that major basketball and a serious education was not compatible. They also found that freshmen had a period of optimism regarding academics when they first arrived on campus, but after about two semesters they found that the social isolation combined with the fatigue of training kept them from becoming involved in academic life (Adler, 2010).
Lapchick (1989) notes that a perfect example of this would be Fred Butler. He was passed on through his entire education. From elementary, middle, and high school based on his excellence in football. When he graduated from high school, he was at the second grade reading level. He went in to El Camino Junior College. There, he took a number of physical activity classes while hoping to be drafted into the NFL. When no offer came, he played at California State University-Los Angeles for a year and a half. When again no offer came, and his eligibility expired, he failed out of school within months with no degree no offers to play, and no skills to use for employment. In addition, he still could not read! (Lapchick, 1989). Another example of the educational system that is set up in order to prepare an individual for future success that has failed.
Edelman stated that the nearly everybody college athletes’ students do not take delivery to college and a cause is in force, and they play a game. There is a great pressure on them to do fine, incredible will drop and somewhat is the education. Coaches of college have been recognized to appear on the further way concerning student athletes and teachers as long that, player can assist to win games (Edelman, 2011). For the majority college athletes, their eligibility is tired college plans do not require further for their military. For 4 years, each day, the college programs have efforts on youth whether it is male or female to death. The college programs have attained all; they would get the players. At the college stage or at the other stage, it is immediately about engaging games and bringing a lot of wealth (Jozsa, 2012).
McKenzie and Tullock (2012) are also arguing that a college athlete is extremely solid. In the primary, set the figure of hours that players set many efforts each day and week. All days, they are in class after that they are training, then they take dinner and then pass exams. At present, this might seem easy to them, but the time amount of these student athletes set in vast. The coaches desire more (Branch, 2011). There would be layer to learn, and there might be times, by the athletic trainer, when they are observed. As the student of athlete, one want to focus on athletic performance and own studies. College athletes move violently with the school’s teachers. Numerous do not graduate at all, and a few immediately stop entirely. College athletics is not for everybody, moreover many student athletes cannot slash pay as the players and pay them amazing for their effort and time (McKenzie & Tullock, 2012).
The purpose of the research is to influence the student athletes in order to acquire them free learning, free room, free books, their board, and the possibility of having a first-class college education that will last for long. Players make a lot of money for the coaches, the school while they are only enticed in terms of by a small amount school fees (Branch, 2011). This research has been talking about college athletes’ wealth or receiving pay. The consequences indicated that, for a good student and player, college sports and education are most important. When money is involved, it becomes easier for the student to lose sight of the big picture. Sports are a great recreational activity, but colleges are intended for educational purposes. The college aim is to prepare students for their future, with a quality education. These student-athletes get open learning or have a scholarship at the university (Jozsa, 2012). Regardless of the background of college students, they are attending college for the same purpose, in order to prepare for their future. Very few individuals would go to college for alternate reasons.
It is important to understand the regulations instituted by the NCAA. The NCAA’s constitutes “Student-athletes shall be amateurs in an intercollegiate sport, and their participation should be motivated primarily by education and by the physical, mental, and social benefits to be derived. Student participation in intercollegiate athletics is an avocation, and student-athletes should be protected from exploitation by professional and commercial enterprises.” The premise set by the NCAA is that education should be first, and all other aspects, including sports, should be secondary. This validates the restrictions of paying for college athletes. If it is about the money, their focus will continue to be on the game primarily, and education if they have time.
The money they earn often make the colleges blind. The amount of revenue generated from their student athletes is quite substantial. Someone believe that it is nothing more than exploiting their players. “This Comment contends that athletic scholarships do not adequately and fairly compensate student-athletes in light of the substantial revenue they generate for their schools. This Comment also argues that current NCAA rules prohibiting compensation have various legal defects” (Acain, 2008). These defects allow the university to become rich at the expense of the players. All the while, education is still secondary to the game. These facts are very disturbing in the big picture of things. No matter what regulations are implemented, education still seems like the secondary priority for college players. There are many arguments to what is right and wrong in association with college sports. Is it ethical, is it legal, is college players shown favoritism, these questions all are valid in light of the information presented. However, the reality is that college sports are here to stay, so finding the best balance between university and student success is the best way to go. Universities are making millions of dollars on their college athletes. Paying their scholarships, books, and room and board seem minimal in exchange for the money they are making. Students are given a little time to spend on their scholarly responsibilities, so working in order to generate income is not an option either. Following NCAA regulations limit the personal rights and freedoms of college athletes during the year. These regulations are implemented to ensure that these students are paid for the education they are promised.
According to the thesis statement, the student athletes are not acceptable to have careers during school and scholarship athletes’ earnings are imperfect to their rooms. Moreover, the athletes should receive direct recompense is arguable but with the quite large money being made with the stable risk that, these players expression stop onto that field at each time. Therefore, the college learning is sufficient reimbursement for a life of paralysis.
The subject of paying college athletes has been on the increase in the recent past due to the high level of concern that it raises. Just like the professional players, college athletes play the game with all their hearts and commit most of their time to the game they play. However, the NCAA does not allow college athletes to get monetary compensation for the games they play. This article looks at the various reasons that make it necessary for college athletes to be paid.
College athletes should be paid for the games they played. This is because the college students generate a lot of revenue for the games they play. Many colleges generate a lot of revenue from the games in which their students take part. For instance, football and basketball players generate billions in revenue for their colleges. However, the according to the NCAA, students are not allowed to take any amount of money as rewards thus are limited to scholarships from the schools. Though college fee is high in many schools, this reward is not enough for the students. According to NCAA, college games generated an astonishing $749.8 million in the year 2009-2010, due to the students' athletes' ability to play to their fullest and to entertain.
Moreover, college athletes should be paid for their efforts in promoting the public image of their sponsors. Most companies, especially in the consumer industry have used student athletes to promote themselves and in order to get an increased outreach to other potential customers. Through promotions, companies pay huge sums of money to the NCAA and the respective colleges of the athletes. The money is then used to help other students through scholarships alongside promoting the development of the institutions.
In addition, student athletes should be paid for the time and efforts they use in playing the game. Just like professional athletes, student athletes spend a lot of time in practicing to perfect their skills in order to win games. Winning games, helps to promote the range of colleges and the public image of it, as well as that of their sponsors. Just like in the corporate world, athlete students should be paid since they are an asset to the institution and help the school and sponsors in creating more money for them (Ramachandran , 2012).