Green, R.(2001). The Human Embryo Research Debates: Bioethics in the Vortex of Controversy.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Buy Information Literacy on Stem Cell Research essay paper online
Professor Green forcefully criticizes the pursuit for "objective markers" in discussion around ethical standing, personhood, and associated notions, reasoning that biology entails ongoing activities as opposed to "events", and that selection of determining factors are produced exclusively by means of value-dependent choices. He advocated a pluralistic solution employing a number of factors in determining the general ethical validity of stem cell research. Likewise undesirable, claims the writer, were National Bioethics Advisory Commission's (NBAC) suggestion to stop both private and public efforts at human cloning and its choice not to produce any advice with regards to human embryo investigation as associated with cloning. Green indicates that in attempting to sidestep political debate around embryo research, the NBAC was unable to follow through on its proclaimed consideration of the threat of doing harm to children. Spiritual and ethical arguments should be put aside except if they could be based on issues suitable for "a pluralistic democracy" and sensibly obvious concerns of public security and well-being.
Green is an ethics professor in a university department of religious studies, and uses his expertise as a participant of the Research Panel of National Institutes of Health Human Embryo (NIH) in 1994 to advocate for government-financed human embryo study and to resist the discussions of non-secular groups standing against such researching. The NIH panel's suggestions appeared to be undercut by political issues and eventually replaced by the efforts of the NBAC, founded by President Clinton in1997. Comprehensive chronological records of the cultural factors as well as opposing organizations following certain technological discoveries, in addition to philosophical insights on the intended theme, are offered. In an "Afterword" included as the book was going to be published, the writer records his approval of an invitation to head an ethical advisory board for a medical company Advanced Cell Technology ACT, that has declared its plan to clone people.
Morrow, L.(2001, July 30). The Faustian Bargain of Stem Cell research. Time Magazine.
Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/nation/printout/0,8816,167312,00.html
Lance Morrow's article in Time Magazine communicates a caution aimed at protecting against going forward with stem cell study utilizing embryonic stem cells. The author offers a couple of primary reasons in opposition to this kind of research. To start with, there is the concept that all innovative knowledge, and the wonders to be realized from it, likewise hold the chances of massive prospects of evil mistreatment. Therefore, the genuine science that resulted in an understanding of the way to split the atom ended in the explosion of an nuclear bomb at Hiroshima. The other issue is the slick slope point. The utilization of unnecessary frozen embryos at clinics focusing on fertility that could in any other case be thrown away could be explained as allowable, because they are already meant for elimination. Yet, this initial step may bring about additional rationalizations, possibly finishing with that human life is delivered into being completely for the aim of being cannibalized for separate parts.
Lance Morrow, previously a professor of journalism, is a writer and an essayist, mainly for Time Magazine, in addition to being the author of a number of books. He received the National Magazine Award in1981 for Essay and Criticism. His article is intelligent in that it puts the problem in both a rational framework of western thinking and in the framework of contemporary European background. In this article he looks at Franz Stangl who inside of the Nazis started to arrange humane euthanasia for the extremely impaired individuals at a mental home and continued to turn out to be "the kommandant of Treblinka", in which he supervised the destruction of large numbers of Jews. Even though Morrow claims that he could understand both the possible advantages of embryonic stem cell research together with its prospects for mistreatment, his tone evidently signifies a prejudice towards this kind of research.
The President's Council on Bioethics (2002). Human Cloning and Human Dignity: The
Report of the President's Council on Bioethics. New York: PublicAffairs. Retrieved from http://www.bioethics.gov
This report contains chapters regarding the significance of human cloning, a number of historical factors, terms, research background, moral issues, public policy alternatives, and policy suggestions. Likewise incorporated are evaluations of findings of previous government as well as professional association studies, in addition to a glossary, bibliography and statements from 14 out of the 17 council associates. Cloning is described as "a turning point" in our history--the traversing of an essential level removing sexual from asexual reproduction, and the initial stage in the direction of genetic management of the generation to come. While Council associates continued to have different opinions on moral suggestions, they all came to the conclusion that the whole report displayed a reasonable and an appropriate representation of their personal perspectives and the motives for them. Non-secular positions are not dealt with specifically, yet are discussed within wider ethical categories and are shown in a number of personal statements. Various ideas of "dignity" as well as "respect" are illustrated. The ethical case against cloning for biomedical research, for example, is grounded on the moral condition of the cloned embryo, human life exploitation in addition to an ethical damage to contemporary society.
This is the initial statement of the President's Council on Bioethics, officially set up by President Bush in 2001, to counsel the President on matters of bioethics associated with developments in biomedical technology and scientific research. Council Chair L. R. Kass in his letter to the President emphasizes the purpose to remove obscurity from and not to soften the distinctions. Talking about the report's subject range, Kass points out that the council members have steered clear from a shallow practical calculation of advantages and costs, or an investigation centered merely on personal rights, and rather have based their thoughts on the wider plane of human reproduction as well as healing with their more profound meanings. The adjusted and consistent terminology of the report, determined by an apparent reasoning, will be helpful for all involved in policy and science, not excluding an average person.
Sinskey, A., Finkelstein, S. and Cooper, S (2005, August 8). "The Consequences of Limiting
Stem Cell Research: Health and Economic considerations." Pharmaceutical Discovery, v5, 22(2). Retrieved from http://newsmedical.tradepub.com.
This article focuses on the financial advantages of stem cell studies. In view of the governmental limitations on delivering funds for it, states have undertaken measures to help make the funds accessible. California has accomplished so, and the similar project has been suggested by a representative of legislature from Massachusetts . They point out that states that help make financing accessible will turn out to be magnets to researchers who are willing to go after stem cell investigation, and the business will encourage economic development in those areas. Determined by a report by the Bank of Boston, the article claims that strategy of investment results in solutions, which bring about income and newer investment decisions for the next cycle of breakthroughs. This can be appropriate for biotechnology as well as other research-motivated market sectors. It is uncertain that these kinds of financial considerations will hold significant sway with people who bring up ethical arguments to stem cell investigation. On the other hand, they are valid from a matter-of-fact perspective.
The three authors represent the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and are academics who intensely advocate for of embryonic stem cell studies. They have published this piece in reaction to the statement by now former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney’s that he would recommend laws criminalizing certain elements of stem cell investigation. Just as the title of the article declares, they provide a couple of reasons in substantiation of stem cell studies. The article offers a set of references. "Pharmaceutical Discovery” is apparently an industry journal that would naturally be an advocate of any researching that would result in industry development and income. Refering to Harold Varmus, former National Institutes of Health's director , they claim that stem cell investigation features the capacity to transform the course of medical science and enhance the quality as well as duration of life. Specifically, they remark that stem cells could be utilized to produce disease cultures for drug tests. This could likewise have financial advantages, due to the fact instead of purchasing a cancer line, researchers could investigate their own disease-connected genes faster and cheaper.
Related Free Review Essays
- The Mortgage Meltdown and Wall Street Failure
- The Patriot
- The Giving of Orders
- Summary of Three Articles
- Bill Gates: The Path to the Future
- 21 Years of Biologically Effective Dose
- Garrett Hardin's "The Tragedy of the Commons"
- Nickel and Dimed Review
- Freud’s Views Regarding Human Nature and Civilization’s Resulting Future
- Sustainable Restaurant Literature Review