• Order now
    •  

      Toll-Free Numbers

      Call me back Live Support
Free «Peer Review» Essay Sample

Organization

Buy Peer Review essay paper online

Title of your paper
Type of assignment
Pages
-
+
Academic level
Timeframes
Spacing

* Final order price might be slightly different depending on the current exchange rate of chosen payment system.

Currency
  • Total price
  •  
 
Continue to order
 

The general organization of the essay is unsatisfactory. This is because the essay does not adhere to the general format for thesis writing. First, the essay is lacking a clear underlined thesis statement to whether the writer is in support of the topic or not. The underlined thesis is supposed to come as the last phrase in the introduction. This thesis also has to be mentioned or reviewed at the end or conclusion of the essay which is not the case here. The beginning of the essay is dull and does not contain any grabber statement that may attract attention of the reader.

However, there is a small extend of explanation on the context of the debate in the introduction although it is not satisfactory or up to standards. In the discussion, the writer clearly shows the controversy that exists on the topic highlighting incidences where the patient/doctor confidentiality may be breached and other incidences where the confidentiality should be enhanced. The transition between points and paragraphs is not satisfactory. However, counter arguments, concession and refutation are clearly illustrated in the essay (Johnson, 2011), (Langbein, 2010).

Want an expert to write a paper for you
Talk to an operator now
 

Content

The essay has a good content with at least three arguments in support of the thesis as well as appropriate rebuttal of the counter arguments. However, there is totally no clear conclusion and no summary of the views on either supporting or opposing the issue. The writer has established some common grounds of agreement between the two sides although this is not very satisfactory (Johnson, 2011), (Langbein, 2010).

Analysis

 
 
Special offer for new customers!
Get 15% OFF
your first order

I like the content and can agree that the essay contains relevant points supported with credible evidence and examples. There is little if any fallacious reasoning involved since the writer has tried as much as possible to use logical reasoning. However, the supported material is not logically sequenced (Johnson, 2011), (Langbein, 2010).

Style, Grammar and Mechanics

This is where there is a big problem. The diction or the formality level that has been used in this essay does not actually meet the audience expectations and is not appropriate. There are a lot of grammar mistakes including poor use of punctuation marks (commas and semi colons), typos, spelling errors, and poor sentence construction. The writing style is generally poor (Johnson, 2011), (Langbein, 2010).

Documentation

Although the references are present with appropriate sources, there is totally a mismatch of in text citation and the citations on the reference list. Citation is poor and both the list on the references and the in text citations does not follow the APA or MLA styles of citation. The content of the reference list is not similar with what is contained in the essay (Johnson, 2011), (Langbein, 2010).

   

What our Clients say

Read all testimonials
Close
 
 
Get 15%OFF   your first custom essay order Order now Prices from $12.99 /page
X
Click here to chat with us