Custom «Biblical context analysis procedures» Essay Paper

1) What is the difference between analyzing a Bible verse from the perspective of "What does this mean to me?" or "What did the text mean to the original writer and his audience?" Time difference; this is the primary difference between the analysis of a biblical verse for a current reader in comparison with its analysis to the original writer of the test. This is primarily because of the differences of the situations that each individual is able to experience. Words expressed during a certain time in history may naturally differ from the understanding of one living in another indicative point of time. The circumstances and situations that govern a particular era present words differently to people to whom the texts are dedicated to hence, the meaning of such written texts change over time depending on the reader’s situation. 2) What steps are involved in historical-cultural and contextual analysis? Historical-cultural analysis usually involves the studying of the environmental background considered when certain texts are written. It could be noted that through this particular process, the background reasons as to how and why the writer have interpreted the words that he has written the word the way he did could be clarified. So to speak, the circumstance that the writer currently dealt with during those times naturally affects the perspectives he has towards life and the issues that he may have been interested in which he later on puts into writing. Meanwhile, contextual analysis pursues the understanding of the words and the sentence structure used by the author as he scribbles down his thoughts into writing. The correlation of the words and the sentences altogether naturally creates fine display on how the writer likely wants to share his ideas to his target readers. 3) Why is summarizing the author's purpose in a single sentence important? This particular process clarifies the entire theme of a long verse. Having done this creates a clarified understanding to one as to how each word within the text relates to one another to form the sense in sending out the idea of the said compressed theme. 4) Explain the difference between noumenological and phenomenological writing. Noumenological understanding refers to the anti-aesthetic situations happening to human individuals that actually affect their minds; while phenomenological understanding refers to the capability of the mind to decipher situations and messages basing from the experiences that they face every day. In this regard, when it comes to writing, noumenological method naturally involves the application of the situational understanding of the writers depending on the stored ideas they have towards the said issues, while on the other hand, phenomenological writing depends on the understanding that one has with regards a certain situation based on the experiences that he once had before. 5) How can a person differentiate between descriptive and prescriptive text? A descriptive text simply aims to relate, narrate a situation that may or may not have direct affect on a reader while a prescriptive text tends to advice, educate and give the reader a chance to see through the writing and examine himself so as to know how he could apply what he read to himself and the ways by which he lives. 6) What books in the New Testament are not epistles? Explain the difference between an epistle and a letter, and outline the nature of the Epistles. Mathew, Mark, Luke and John are among the New Testament’s book that are considered non epistles as they aim to simply relate the situations that happened during the time of Jesus Christ through simple narrative expression of what they know have happened during those days. Considerably, it is through this particular matter that the four first books of the New Testaments were considered as an introductory part of the whole section of the Bible as they plainly relate the life of Jesus and how it affected the lives of the people during his time. With regards the rest of the New Testament books, especially those of the written texts of Paul to the different early Christian Congregations, it could be recognized that the process of writing depends on the idealisms, the thoughts, the principles and the guidance that the writer further wants to imply on the receivers of his letters. It is through this particular approach that the writers were able to directly present their thoughts as moving words that aims to change a reader’s view about a certain matter that may concern them personally. 7) How do the Epistles being occasional in nature influence hermeneutic interpretation? Hermeneutics, being the study of the interpretative theory on written texts naturally connotes the possibility of the personal reasons why writers write their thoughts using the words and the structure of sentences as they do, gives out a chance of clarifying the thought on why epistle writers such as Paul tried to use the words he did to encourage the early Christian congregations to deal with the situations in their lives in a successful way based on a strong principle of truth and righteousness.

8) Why does exegesis come before hermeneutics analysis?

Exegesis is a much broad, much critical process of analyzing text. It could be noticed that at some point, the theories and procedures considered to be a part of the hermeneutic analysis is already considered in the application of exegesis clarification of texts. This is the reason why when explaining textual ideas with regards the bible, exegesis is first applied before hermeneutics.