To start with, public sector is run by the government while the private sector can be run by anyone be it an individual or a group of people. Following this perspective, inefficiency refers to unskillfulness which may result to a waste of time and resources in the business world. More to this point, there is a broader difference between inefficiency in the private sector and in the public sector. These differences are outstanding due to the difference in management of the two sectors. Nevertheless, the ability to reduce expenses and carry out activities fluctuates significantly between the two.
The private sector experience inefficiency due to the limited sources of finance as compared to the public sector which gets its funding basically from the government as well as the private sector. Along with this, the private sector faces inefficiency when there is a weak incentive to generate competently. On the other hand, most public sectors are not profit orientated and this has really attributed to ineffectiveness. In connection with this, both sectors inefficiency comes as a result of poor communication from the central market (Gwartney et al. 139).
Notably, the private sector depends on strategic plans formulated by experts for effectiveness. In case the plans are wanting the stocks prices go down and this is a sign of ineptitude. Simultaneously, lack of competence in governmental enterprises has caused reluctance among bureaucrats. Actually, the bureaucrats involve themselves with their own individual business with less care about the financial status of the organization causing its downfall. In the same line of thought, insolvency corrodes inadequacy in the private sector while in the public sector such measures of eliminating incompetence are not there (Gwartney et al. 139).
Apart from this, monopolistic dominance also causes inefficiency in these sectors. As a result, the prices of products rise up hence reducing the output. Along with this, most public sector enterprises are held together in cooperation’s which misbehave and are unable to maximize production (Gwartney et al. 139). In this context, the authorities in the public sector tend to handle official issues in a compromising manner which eventually causes losses hence ineffectiveness.
It can also be noted that politicians use public sectors to spread political propaganda. It is in line with this that social policies are manipulated and the prices of goods and services are tempered with. In essence, market rules and regulations are ignored and this contributes to high levels of inefficiency (Grahovac 76). On the other hand, purchase of protectionist policies by the public sector has cut down completion and even the private sectors are not allowed to be shareholders in some enterprises. For this reason, the private sector has been denied expansion in some directions and this has also contributed to the incompetence of this sector.
In conclusion, inefficiency in the private and public sectors differs in many ways especially in what causes it. Just to mention a few, in the private sector inefficiency is caused by limited financial resources as well as presence of weak incentives .In conjunction with this, public sectors are not profit motivated and this therefore has brought a lot of ineffectiveness. Apart from this, poor leadership skills and political matters have also contributed in the incompetence of the public sector. A long with this, the private sector depends on strategic plans formulated by experts for effectiveness and incase this plans are ineffective they are nullified and this also causes inefficiency.