Poverty and social class are very vital in determining the levels of inequalities among individuals. Over the years, there have been significant fluctuations in poverty and inequality levels where communities have experienced increased levels of unemployment and limited resources; a situation that has resulted to social stratifications. As we all are aware, every individual is born and raised in a cultural and social setting that includes a family, language, social class, religion and community among others. People who are brought up in the same cultural settings have more or less the same responses and adaptations to these environments. 'The concept of social class is crucial to the analysis of society and human behaviour and therefore to any explanation of the existence and scale of poverty.(1) Following this, people who were born in poor family backgrounds are likely to live and die poor, while those born in well-off backgrounds hardly experience difficulties in life. This essay is therefore intended to determine the various ways in which poverty is correlated with the social classes in bringing identity and individuality among different people living in different social classes as well as define some of the key terms and concepts that relate to this topic.
There has been never a distinct definition of poverty. Different communities define poverty as a social occurrence under which individuals' and households' standards of living are below a certain level accepted by the society.(2) However, most scholars and researchers have defined poverty in two terms. There is absolute and relative definition. Absolutely, poverty can be defined as the inability of an individual to satisfy his/ her basic needs such as clothing, food, health and shelter.(3) However, these needs vary depending on the location, culture and social class of an individual. Relative poverty on the other hand is defined as the level of wealth possession in relation to the society within which an individual lives. (4) This definition though brings some controversies on where the poverty line should be drawn. Poverty therefore goes hand in hand with the social class which is commonly defined as the concept that defines the social status of an individual. Colquhoun suggests that without poverty there would be no labour and the rich would not live happily. (5) In other words, social class is a large group of individuals that are regarded by other people or regard themselves as having some similarities in terms of their occupation, education levels, social backgrounds, experiences, and societal positions among others. Thus in most cases, people who share the same social class have these, in addition to other factors, in common.
Social classes are determined in terms of social strata/ stratification which are a hierarchy of status in relation to the economic productivity that manipulates the social returns to those in the status.(6) The four commonly recognized social classes include; upper class, middle class, working class and finally lower class. 'The size and composition of social classes depend on the relative prosperity of a particular country'.(7) The upper class comprise of people who come from well established families as a result of high income earning. Such people have great authority over resources and possess significantly large amounts of these resources. They may also practice indirect or direct power through capital investment. Their high salaries and great potential for accessing wealth generally increase their visibility and power over the resources. Another significant characteristic of the upper class population is that they pass the wealth from one generation to another. While people from middle and low social classes have to work hard and struggle in order to secure good job positions and get rich, people from upper social classes do not need to do all this; they automatically inherit wealth that is sufficient enough to maintain their social standards.(8) Following this, they never face any hardships in life as compared to their counterparts living in low or middle class.
Middle class on the other hand is described as a set of individuals who are well educated and possess high salaried jobs but not as high as those in the upper class. Their incomes are in most cases high and they depend on and value education since most of them are degree holders. This class is made up of professional people such as lawyers, engineers and professors among others. This class is also likely to have high influence in the society. The lower class generally defines a group of people who work in supporting jobs in order to earn a living. People in this social class as less advantaged as compared to those in middle class even though some of their household income is higher than the accepted low income threshold. Working class is the lowest in the hierarchy of social stratification.(9)
Different organizations have however simplified social classes differently. The Registrar General has classified people into six social classes. These include the professional, the intermediate, skilled but working in non-manual occupation, skilled but doing manual jobs, partly skilled and finally the unskilled. The NS-SEC on the other hand classifies people into three major classes which in tern have some sub-classes. These three classes include the advantaged, the intermediate and the subordinate in descending order. The other organization that has also contributed in classifying populations into classes is the NS Socio-Economic Classification. This organization classifies individuals into eight social classes; the higher managerial and professional, the lower managerial and professional, intermediate, small employers and own account workers, lower supervisory and technical, semi-routine, routine and finally the long-term unemployment.
In general terms, social classes are commonly based on the individuals' occupations. In the UK, approximately ten percent of the total population is in upper social classes. They are characterized by people in higher professions, large employers and managers. Fifty-three percent of the population is classified as living in the intermediate social class. People falling in this group include; small employers, supervisors, low managers and technicians. The remaining people, which make almost thirty-eight percent of the whole population, are classified as belonging in the subordinate social class.(10)
As already mentioned, poverty is a multi-phased occurrence that includes one's inability to satisfy his/ her basic needs, low education levels, lack of authority over resources, and poor health among others.(11) The determination of poverty is based on occupation and income levels and a person is considered poor his/her occupation and/or income level is below a country's minimum standard acceptable for meeting the basic needs. It is therefore universally accepted that poverty has significant implications on the social classes of different individuals. This is because; there are many ways in which poverty is associated with the social class of an individual. This is simply to imply that poverty is directly related to the level of education, occupation as well as the income. And it is from these parameters that people fall in the various social classes. Tawney suggests that 'What thoughtful rich people call the problem of poverty, thoughtful poor people call with equal justice the problem of riches '.(12) Some of the ways that show correlation between poverty and social class include income, health, education, housing, disability and ethnic minorities.(13) People living in social classes that are considered low by the society are most likely to face difficulties in providing for their families good housing, quality heath, quality education, due to their low income as compared to those people classified as living in high social classes. Rates of disabilities and diseases are also recorded in large numbers in low class families relatively to the high class families. Most of the studies and researches done suggest that most people living in poverty are likely to suffer from mental illnesses in their old age as compared to their counterparts that live well off lives.Want an expert to write a paper for you Talk to an operator now
To begin with, the income of an individual has proved to be the most vital factor in determining the social class in which such an individual is placed. Most societies hold that people that earn more or live above the poverty line are rich and are therefore classified as high class people. The threshold that is commonly used to measure an individual's income is the household income, which stands for the amount of money that is available for a given household to spend on all its needs and requirements from clothing, food, health to entertainment and travel. This threshold is usual calculated by deducting council tax, income tax and housing expenditures from the total income. Statistics show that 60% threshold calculated in the year 2005/2006 was amounting to £108 per week for adults that lived single and had no children to depend on them. Couples who lived together but had no dependent children showed a threshold of £186. On the other hand, single parents who had at least two reliant children had a threshold of £223 while couples that had dependent children had a threshold of £301 per week. Reports indicate that in the financial year 2005/2006 approximately thirteen million people living in the UK were earning less than the proposed low income threshold. This figure indicated that about 22% of the total population was living below the poverty line.(14) This is therefore a clear indication that most of these people are struggling to earn a living. Even though expenses vary from one place to another and also depend on the individual's needs, these people are better classified as low class citizens because they hardly live better lives.
Since social class is commonly presented as a portrayal of how people living in a certain civilization have arranged themselves according to influences, importance and prestige among others, it automatic follows that certain professions or job groups are considered to be more prominent and enviable while others are perceived to be distasteful and retentive.(15) With little or no education, such children do not secure well paying jobs and therefore pass on the
The other way in which poverty is correlated with social class is individual's health. As the gap between the rich and the poor is broadening in the UK, so are the health differences between these social classes. Poverty and social class have significant effects on the mental, physical and social health of an individual.(16) Poverty generates psychosocial trauma which with time results into worsening health hence higher death rates. Several studies have proved that people who live in low class communities where there are limited physical and social infrastructures have poor health which in the long run results into an increase in the mortality rates. The effects of poverty may sometimes cause aggravation, stress and commotion which in most cases lead to increased rates of violence and crime.
It is therefore the poor that rendered into precarious environments, insufficient amenities and requirements and unrewarding jobs which in most cases are stressful. Since they are not part of the conventional society, they are often secluded from support and information. It has been widely accepted that the lowest income earning class is likely to experience unenthusiastic effects of hazardous health behaviors as compared to their counterparts who earn higher than them. Poverty is thus associated with many long term health problems and mortality.(17)
Even though it is not guarantee that lack of money causes mental health, it is universally accepted that it can be both a consequence and a determinant of mental illnesses. The relationship between low social class and incidences of mental illnesses is significantly alarming. Studies and reports indicate that there is direct association between poverty and the rate of mental disturbance as well as the different access to social facilities experienced by people of different social classes. It is generally recognized that the highest pervasiveness of mental disorders such as psychosis is found in women and men living in low social classes. How ever, the association between psychosis and poverty is in one way or another multifaceted. It can be said that the relationship between social class and psychosis is prominent because the living conditions experienced by low social class people promote the commencement of social actuality that are very rigid and limited to an extend that they weaken the individuals' ability to handle traumatic and difficult situations ingeniously.(18) Even though such weakening has not been proved to be directly causing psychosis, together with hereditary susceptibility and the amounting stress, it can be a major contributing factor.
Research also confirms that most psychosis patients who come from low social class families have high levels of delusions and hallucinations as compared to other patients who originate from high and/ or middle class families. High rates of mood disorders have also been reported in adults from low social classes that in middle and high social classes. Reports indicate that occurrence of depression are considerably and steadily higher in low social class people than in middle and high social class populations. Other studies show that depression rates are higher among adults who were originally living in low social class communities, thus supporting the fact that stress that results from poverty may cause depression. Close correlations have also been found between social class and susceptibility to mood disorders, with the higher rates of susceptibility recorded among populations with low levels of education and social success.(19)
In general, the previous researches done in the UK illustrate that health dissimilarities directly related with the social class, deprivation and/ or income are all-encompassing and can be found in all facets of physical conditions from child mortality to the vulnerability of suffering mental illness by the adults. Adults who earn less or classified in the poorest fifth of the earnings distribution are two times at danger of developing mental illnesses as compared to those earn average income. Forty percent of adults aged between forty-five and sixty who earn below the income threshold are likely to suffer long-term illnesses and disabilities twice as those who their income is above average. Researches also reveal that children that have been born and brought up in labor-intensive social backgrounds are one-and-a half times prone to death at an early age as compared to children that are born and raised in professional social backgrounds. In the same line of thought, such children are one-and-a quarter times more likely to be born with low birth weight than their counterparts born in non- labor-intensive social backgrounds.(20) This is because; most of these children are born by premature mother; premature in the essence that they are still teenagers. In other words, the rate of teenage motherhood is approximately seven times higher in labor-intensive social backgrounds than in professional backgrounds. Generally, people with high incomes are classified as upper social class people and have improved access to quality health care facilities, high life expectation, low child mortality rates, improved health awareness and low rates of mental illnesses as compared to the people falling in middle, low and working classes. (21)
Another way in which poverty is correlated with social class is in housing and residential neighbourhoods. As already discussed that income is the fundamental measure of poverty and the determinant of which social class an individual falls, it automatically follows that people that earn less hardly have enough to secure them better houses. As a result, such people find themselves living in rental houses that are affordable. In most cases, these areas are overcrowded and the housing conditions are usually poor. (22) On the other hand, individuals that earn higher are capable of securing better houses or even build or buy their own. In most cases, these houses are located in less congested areas and they can afford other luxuries such as entertainment and heating. Reports have confirmed that five percent of the UK population lives in overcrowded areas. It has been proved that population overcrowding is four times higher in social rented houses than in personal houses. The 2005/2006 report shows that over a thousand households had been declared homeless by the local authorities. Approximately sixty percent of this figure represented adults that did not have dependent children. (23)
Ethnic minority is also another area in which poverty and social class correlate. Most people tend to live in areas where there are other people from the same cultural backgrounds. In most cases, immigrants tend to look for places where people from their origin live and rarely will they mix with the locals. (24) As a result, if such people are poor, the whole society becomes poor and it is most likely to be classified as low class.(25) In the UK, a large number of immigrates live in poverty as compared to the local residents. The worst situation comes in when these groups make the minorities in terms of social ethnic. (26) Reports show that two-fifths of the total population of people coming from racial minorities lives in low social class societies due to income poverty. This is two times higher as compared to the rate of the White people living in the UK. Large social variations have been observed among different social groups. For instance, more than fifty percent of the people with Pakistani and Bangladesh ethnic backgrounds live in poverty. This rate is higher compared to those with Indian ethnic background. Only a quarter of the Indians living in the UK are poor; this is just slight higher than the rate of Whites living in poverty. These differences are significantly greater in families where at least one person is working for pay i.e. forty percent of Pakistanis, sixty percent of Bangladesh and thirty percent of Black Africans live in poverty. These figures are much higher than the ten-fifteen percent of the white people living in poverty. Also, a third of Black African and Bangladesh households in the working-age group are unemployed compared to a quarter of the Black Caribbean and Pakistan households.(27) The number of adults reported to have disabilities is also higher among adults living in low social classes than those living in upper social classes.
In conclusion, the essay has successful meet its objective in determining the relationship between poverty and social class. Poverty has been defined in two different ways; the relative definition describes poverty as the level of wealth possessed by an individual in relation to the society within which this individual lives while absolute definition describes poverty as the inability of an individual to satisfy his/ her basic needs such as clothing, food, health and shelter. Social class is defined as a set or a group of people who share some similarities in terms of their occupations, prestige, social backgrounds, experiences, and societal positions among others. Generally people have been classified into four distinct social classes. These classes include the upper class, the middle class, low class and working class in a hierarchy order.
Different organizations have however simplified social classes differently. The Registrar General has classified people into six social classes while the NS Socio-Economic Classification classifies individuals into eight social classes. The NS-SEC on the other hand classifies people into three major classes which in tern have some sub-classes. Social classes are passed on from one generation to another because they are hereditary i.e. a low-class family is most likely to give birth to and raise a low-class child and not otherwise. This applies to all the other classes and in the long run, the child grows to make close relationships with the people in his/her class thus strengthening the social class.
Poverty correlates with social class in various ways. Some of them include; income, health, education, housing, ethnic minorities and disability. People that are classified as upper class earn higher because they have control over resources, enough access to good and quality education, quality health facilities, live in better houses and have less chances of suffering from chronic illnesses such as mental disorders, alongside other diseases. People that come from social classes that are considered as low in the society are usually vulnerable to experiencing stressful situations due to the exposure to harsh social environments. Such people are segregated and in the long run have no access to quality education, health services and good housing. Rates of disability and child mortality are also higher in these societies as compared to their counterparts living in upper class settings. It can comfortably be declared that poverty and social class closely work together to bring identity and individuality of people living in different social environments.