Use discount code: LoveMyDaddy and get 19% OFF your order! Hurry up! Get your Father’s Day Gift from ExclusivePapers.com!
In this article, author is making an argument that the standardised testing is detrimental for our students, teachers, schools and society. The author offers following reasons as proof- Since this system is not proven as it has never been carried out and tested in American history, therefore it may harbor some unknown dangers. It appears to be un-sound as no other country follows this type of practice. The author states that another flaw of this system is that it measure superficial knowledge and therefore encourages the students to develop a habit of shallow thinking rather than intellectual thinking. The author further supports and strengthens his point by stating that he has never come across a scholar of repute who has accredited and recommended this system for the younger children. According to him, the practice is unworthy because test scores vary across students according to their social differences rather than the teaching methods. Further demerit of the standardised testing advocated by the author is that schools are cutting those otherwise essential programmes that do not have standard testing procedures and making education even worse.He makes an essential argument that the money and time which is wasted in preparation of testing material could be diverted to real teaching. Author argues that repeated and irrelevant testing results in poor teaching which further deteriorates the standard of poorer schools that end up getting lesser scores and ultimately the least bonuses. Thus it is the tests that are responsible for poor performance of students in poorer areas but, not even politicians and policy makers warrant this and it is lamented as an excuse made by the teachers. Author supports his claim by explaining the plight of teachers under this system. He maintains that due to misplaced emphasis on scoring, the teachers are under ever-increasing pressure and therefore, merely facilitating students to obtain higher scores. However, many teachers are recognizing and sensing that this is a futile endeavor and it really does not constitute good education. As a reason, a number of teachers have left teaching to seek other better and fulfilling professions.
Special offer for new customers!
Get 15% OFF
your first order
The teachers have been made accountable for the low scores of students which are actually due to the students belonging to less educated families. On the other hand, existing resources, education and knowledge of rich and educated families help their wards to acquire knowledge more easily. This knowledge is then tested and they end up scoring more than the students belonging to poorer and less educated families. Author has progressed from discussing inadequacies of the tests in judging the knowledge of students leading to improper learning to wastage of resources due to standard testing. Then author has shifted to poorer students who scored low, standard testing as the main reason claimed by him. Author is then emphasizing a direct relationship between poor social and economic status and low scores thereby, trying to support his argument that therefore standardised testing is not relevant. Author has taken his argument further and rendered standardised testing as the biggest culprit in marginalization of these students rather than poverty, racism, poor facilities, inadequate funds and less staff. Had a standardised testing been done under a situation where there is a better teacher to student ratio, different solution oriented programmes and a well planned approach, would then also standard testing be as irrelevant as claimed by the author? These issues has not been raised by the author, instead due to clever use of language the standard testing appears to be the focal issue and main culprit. Certainly author’s language has played an important part in influencing his audience that the standardised testing is bad and ultimately worse for the ones who need an education imminently. Audience of his subject are various stake holders such as policy makers, public officials, journalists, parents and teachers belonging to the poorer districts of United States in late nineties, where education of the students of ethnical minorities was a big challenge.
Get 24/7 Free consulting
Related Free Communication and Media Essays
- an analytical essay on how the various production elements, when put into context, influence the creation of meaning in the audience
- the character of rick in all over but the shoutin
- Symbolic Interactionism
- Disgrace by J.M. Coetzee
- Communication Networks
- safe surfing
- managing interpersonal conflict
- communication and Interpersonal skills
- How Students Use Social Media