Relationships between individuals are based on individual qualities and their abilities to relate with fellow beings in the society. People perform different functions in the society and all of them are guided by relationship principles that people meet while socialize the exchange of morals cultures and other values; but what matters the most is how one holds the value of the opposite individual. It is important for an individual to feel him/herself as being part of a society at his or her own accordingly, while the society should be ready to accept his or her personality (Eisenberg, 2007).
Friendliness is a virtue that is held by individuals in the society. While meeting new people, one should be careful not to cause pain or suffering to them. Quarrelsome and cantankerous people in the society seek to cause pain and harm to others and do not seem to care in opposing others. Living together and having common dealings in communication is a trait that is characterized by individuals who are ingratiating; as they only do this to praise and please others with no intention of crossing people, only in causing pain to others that come across (David, 2009).
Clearly, the states mentioned blame intermediate states between people; it is praiseworthy according to those who object things when they are right or when they are wrong. Such a state has no name, but friendship would seem to be the character of the individual in the transitional state. Seeing the person as a decent friend, but the difference is this friend is fond of others. Such a state differs from friendship because it does not require any special feeling or fondness for the group society meets. Such an individual takes things the right way as this is the right thing to do, meaning he/she treats all his new and old acquaintances, strangers or familiar companions with no distinction or discrimination (15a).
This is because one cannot hurt the feeling of people familiar to him or her so as to justify hurting stranger. By treating each person equally, one is being fair and will not cause pleasure or pain to any of these two groups, but ensure both receive equal benefits (20b). A person should consider the pain or harm, or even pleasure that he/she would cause people by meeting them and decide if to share these harmful or pleasurable feelings. If meeting them will cause him or her pain as he/she gives them pleasure, then he or she objects and decides to cause them pain instead. Furthermore, if the person one meets does not suffer any pain or harm by doing a particular action, then he or she will object the action (25c).
When the person meets people of great reputation for worth, his or her attitude becomes different, compared to the attitude he/she has for other ordinaries. One will take different attitudes for different people starting from those familiar to him/her to those he or she knows less; according to what attitude suit each one of them (30d). But what he or she chooses, should not cause pain rather should cause pleasure. The consequences of person’s choice will be his/her guiding factor; so to say, if they are great in terms of finesse and expedient, person will cause less pain in order to secure pleasure in the future. Later, this character can be associated with an intermediate person. People who aim to share pleasure with no hidden purpose are said to be ingratiating, while those who do it for money or other factors are referred to as flatters. Those who object to everything are described as quarrelsome or cantankerous individuals. Because the intermediate conation has no name, the extreme appears to be the opposite only of each other (35e).