• Order now
    •  

      Toll-Free Numbers

      Call me back Live Support
Free «The Differences between Aristotle and Kant» Essay Sample

Issues relating to the definition of the truth, laws and forms of thinking have interested people since ancient times. Kant and Aristotle were two philosophers who gave their definitions of these issues. Although the problems were the same, the philosophers represented different approaches to their solution.

Buy The Differences between Aristotle and Kant essay paper online

Title of your paper
Type of assignment
Pages
-
+
Academic level
Timeframes
Spacing

* Final order price might be slightly different depending on the current exchange rate of chosen payment system.

Currency
  • Total price
  •  
 
Continue to order
 

Aristotle created the doctrine of the forms of comprehending the truth of thought though the logic. The human mind, according to him, was regarded to be a special mechanism. In order for the science of logic to be applied, it must be based on the continuing existence. The truth is regarded to be the highest form of existence. Individual, perceiving the truth, is closer to the perfect being.

Want an expert to write a paper for you
Talk to an operator now
 

Kant evaluated these issues differently. According to him, the truth is “subjective” by nature, and the focus during the study of truth should be placed on the evaluation of the life by the individual himself. There can be no universal criterion of truth. Everything that an individual has – here Kant agrees with Aristotle – is the formal laws of logic. However, Kant argued that these laws are based on the a priori forms of reason. Kant’s concept of human comprehension of the world on the basis of the a priori forms of reason allowed philosophers to overcome the deadlock the philosophical though encountered.

 
 
Special offer for new customers!
Get 15% OFF
your first order

Kant and Aristotle may be regarded as very similar; they both believed that human mind can know objective knowledge. However, Aristotle viewed human mind as capable of getting to know real world that exists outside of itself. Kant asserted that the world an individual objectively perceives is made up of the sense data. Therefore, our knowledge is limited to our senses. Besides, Kant and Aristotle had different views on the moral education. For Kant, it was a matter of talk, but for Aristotle it could be achieved though action.

Thus, even though Kant and Aristotle had different approaches, they made great contribution to the general analysis of the given issues. Aristotle and Kant held key positions in the development of philosophical knowledge. Study of Aristotle's formal “objective” laws of thought led to the creation of the science of logic that remains unchanged to this day. Kant’s theory of the laws and forms of comprehending the truth of thought led to the idea of unknowable “things in themselves” that made it impossible to define a general criterion of truth.

   

What our Clients say

Read all testimonials
Close
 
 

Use discount code: LoveMyDaddy and get 19% OFF your order! Hurry up! Get your Father’s Day Gift from ExclusivePapers.com!

Order now
X
Click here to chat with us