The difference on gender listening styles is attributed to the biological and psychological difference between men and women (Klass, 2011). The sexes differ in strength, shape, size and react differently to situations. The difference between men and women is manifested in communication and listening styles. As men and women pay attention, they do so for unlike reasons. At the same time, they look for dissimilar information from the speaker. Men concentrate on the facts while women usually focus on the manner of the communication. However, research indicates that the gender differences in listening and communication are inconsistent and small. The variance is about 1% (Sargent, 2003). The effect leads studies to the question of whether gender differences in listening are real or can be assumed.
Women communicate at a superior extent as they feel more information shared makes a person more understanding. On the contrary, men consider this as the waste of time. Consequently, men might not warily listen as they do not recognize the message as significant. This makes men go straight to the point while, speaking (Kirtley, 2000). The effect makes women to want more information for them, to comprehend the topic. This just gives the notion that the people of different sexes listen for diverse information. There are several studies that have been undertaken to determine the gender difference in listening styles.
-
0
Preparing Orders
-
0
Active Writers
-
0%
Positive Feedback
-
0
Support Agents
In conclusion, data available indicate that indeed there is a pattern of gender differences in listening style. The results indicate that there are self-perceptions on women scoring higher on the populace listening style. On the other hand, men score high on content listening style. This has been supported with the dual-process theories of human being perception. The findings assume that perceptions of peoples’ listening styles are linked to the gender stereotypes (Klass, 2011). Nonetheless, incomprehensible proof of systematically prejudiced reaction tendencies in reporting the listening styles have also emerged. This has created some implications of the findings for future application and research.