Free «A Doll’s House Analysis» Essay Sample

A Doll’s House is Ibsen’s play of 1879, written while the author was in Rome. It was out to challenge the Romantic tradition as there was a fever and a multitude of revolutions in the European system. The author is credited for always mastering and also popularizing the realistic drama that is derived from the evident new perspective. His plays have always been read and also performed throughout the European continent having many translations. It was published in Denmark, the first place that it premiered. The plot of this play has always been believed to have a base on a personal Ibsen life’s event. In the year 1870 Laura Kieler evidently sent Ibsen a thrilling sequel to the famous Brand, referred to as Brand’s Daughters and the author has also taken a massive interest in this pretty, and also vivacious girl, constantly nicknaming her as “the lark.” He invited the lady to his home where the former was seen to constantly visit as she took it as a home. Laura and Nora also exhibit similar-sounding names, which is contrary to their stories which diverge (Henrik Ibsen 12).

Buy A Doll’s House Analysis essay paper online

Title of your paper
Type of assignment
Academic level

* Final order price might be slightly different depending on the current exchange rate of chosen payment system.

VIP Services package ?

Special offer includes all VIP services: top 10 writers, priority Support, VIP editing, extended revision period, SMS notifications, and plagiarism check at a very attractive price.

  • Total price
Continue to order

Many universalist  critics  of the play A  Doll’s  House always make the usual claim  that  this work  can  be  no  more  touching on women  than  men  since  those  interests  of  both  parties are similar  "human"  ones. They claim that  sex  is deemed irrelevant,  and, therefore, gender  nonexistent, which in  its  literary  search  and discovery for  the self, it goes on to transcend  and  also obliterate  mere  biological  and  also social  determinations.  Reinhert says, “Faced  with  a  text  in which  the protagonist  rejects  the nonself  she describes  as  a doll,  the  plaything  of  her  father  and husband,  we  must  take  care  not  to  let  feminism,  the proper  concern  of  pamphlets  or,  perhaps,  thesis plays,  get  in  the  way of the art. Ibsen's  case  is  stronger, not  weaker,  if  we  do not  let  the  tragedy  disappear  in polemics  about women's  rights"  (Reinert  62).

Acknowledging  and crediting the work of Ibsen  and the play A Doll’s House, other critics by the names Zangwill  and  Marx went on to  claim,  "although  we  have  purified  the  drainage of  the  Doll's  House  as thoroughly  as they  did, we have not  found  it  necessary  to seriously  alter  the  building  in  order  to  carry  out  these  sanitary  repairs."  In  their  preface, these  authors  considerably "rejoice"  that  the  final  scene in the play opened  "the  door  of  the  Doll's  House. .  to  the  English  public"  and also permitted  "the  modest  woman  to  enter  its  portals without  bringing  a blush  to  the  cheeks  of  The  Daily  Telegraph"  (Bernard 311).

Want an expert to write a paper for you Talk to an operator now Start live chat now  

In  Marx  and  also Zangwill's  parody,  Nora, a character in the plays,  finds  only  one existing possible  explanation or elucidations, that  he  never ever loves  her again,  which  he goes on to confirm,  and  also explains clearly how  she hurting forfeited  his  love, “For  eight  years  I  thought  of  you  as  an  ideal  woman  -  one  who  did  not  understand  anything, but  who  loved,  a woman  like  millions  of  other  women,  sweetly  sinking  her  own  identity entirely  in  that  of  her  husband.  [.  ..] I  found  you  were  not  the  woman  I  had  taken  you for.  I  found  that  the  money  which  I  thought  your  father  had  providentially  won  at  cards, and  providentially  dying  at  the  right  time  left  to  us,  you  had  obtained  by  forgery,  and that  not  content  with  this  crime,  you  had  worked  to  pay  off  the  debt  thus  improperly contracted” (Bernard 310). Losing a lover is normal in life. Relationships always have mishaps and they are normal occurrences in people’s lives. Nora’s case may be touching on the issue of feminism, depending on a personal perspective. It can also mean that the author had a direct link in his life with the events of the plays. The events may be directly touching on his life or a thoughtful idea.

The  theater  most celebrated critic  of The  Daily  Telegraph,  renowned as England's  largest  newspaper,  was  the  famous  Clement  Scott, staunch  anti-Ibsen,  whose  hostile  review  of  the  play's  first  faithful  production in  England,  which  opened  on  7  June  1889,  appeared  the  following day.  "We  do not honestly  believe  that  those  theories  as expressed  in  The  Doll's  House  would  ever  find favour  with  the  great  body  of  English  playgoers,"  he maintained,  and  he  condemned author’s admirers  along  with  the  play by saying, “How  Torvald  Helmer  could  by  any  possibility  have  treated  his  restless,  illogical,  fractious, and  babyish  little  wife  otherwise  than  he  did;  why  Nora  should  ever  adore  with  such abandonment  and  passion  this  conceited  prig,  whom  she  never  professed  to  understand; and  how  it  could  ever  be  possible  for  any  woman  with  the  maternal  instinct  fully  developed to  desert  her  children  because  her  pride  was  wounded,  are  points  that  may  be  very  clear to  the  Ibsenites,  but  they  require  a  considerable  amount  of  argument  in  order  to  convince the  common  sense  playgoer” (Bernard 308). This may come out as true, but I believe the author of the play did not hold so much agony on Nora as displayed by the critics. Their notion of Nora is completely different from what the main author had in mind.

A Doll’s House play has always been celebrated as the second of all series of main realist plays that Ibsen ever wrote.  In adopting this realist form, the author abandoned his renowned style of verse allegories, saga plays and also historical epics. Ibsen’s letters always reveal that his life events dictate what is contained in almost all of his works. Indeed, he came out as a writer particularly interested in the very possibility of a true wedlock and also in women on general terms and view. He later went on to write a series of controversial psychological studies which clearly focused on women. These have touched so many people in the world, from young children who are ready to grow and develop to grownups.

Special offer for new customers!
Get 15% OFF
your first order

A Doll’s House has many striking features and also characteristics, but the most celebrated one is how it comes out to challenge all of the technical and respected traditions of the play. It is evident in that the first act of the play goes on to offer an exposition of the whole story, the second brings out a situation while the third is seen as an unraveling one. This form always stood out as the most standard one as evident from all the ancient fables until that time of this play, which brought a new dawn to an alternative standard of plays. Ibsen’s play is usually notable for its level of exchanging the truly last of act’s unraveling for people’s discussions, one renowned for leaving the audience particularly uncertain of the conclusion of events in the play.

One of the respected critics known as George Steiner is known to claim that this play is “founded on the belief…that women can and must be raised to the dignity of man,” (George Steiner 12). This is contrary to Ibsen’s personal belief in the play touching more on the significance of self-liberation than that of the relevance of the evident female liberation. Ibsen, however, in his contemporary Strindberg was seen to disagree himself by calling this play a prominent “barbaric outrage” because his use of feminism as the main issue. This may be different as other people may think that the author insinuated something different from the feminist idea.  Ibsen’s other works show that her works are rich in different life touching themes.

Additionally, the play went on to subvert another evident dramatic tradition. The author’s realist drama clearly shown in the play disregarded the tradition that is known of having an older male as the main moral figure. The most qualified character, Dr. Rank, who was deemed as perfect to serve this coveted role, is not any near from exhibiting positive moral forces. Instead, he comes out as not only being sickly, where he is seen rotting from a communicable disease that he picked up from the evident sexual exploits of his father, but also extremely lascivious, openly seen coveting Nora. The choice that the author took to portray both the character Dr. Rank and also the potentially exhibited and matronly Mrs. Linde as extremely imperfect humans appeared like a real novel approach at that given time.

The prevalent revolutionary spirit and also the precise emergence of the portrayed modernism influenced the author’s choice in the play, to keenly focus on the unlikely hero, represented as a housewife, in his profound attack on all middle-class values. Critics and parlors in the European continent never failed to talk about it, as the play emerged as succeeding in its first attempt to substantially provoke discussion. As evident in the play, it is the many ways and illustrations that this play can always be read and also interpreted that variably make it so appealing.

The Christmas tree, as used in the play, is known worldwide as a festive object always meant to be used as for decorative purposes, comes out to symbolize Nora’s evident position in the household as one plaything who is always pleasing others to look at and also add charm to her home. Many parallels are critically drawn between Nora and also the Christmas tree as seen in the play. Just as, Nora goes on to instruct the maid that all the children cannot view the tree before it is decorated, she decides to tell Torvald that nobody is allowed to have a view of her dress until that evening of their dance (Bernard 320). This shows that the play has both the positive s and also the negatives. The critics look at it from a different perspective than what I perceive as being the best.

The play, employing both comic and stage conflict, comes out to express many themes that are still prevalent in the modern world. It is a play worth recollecting. Starting from its setting, to the plot, and symbols, one can feel a new way and standards of play writing.

Most popular orders


What Our Clients Say

Read all testimonials
Happy Independence Day!
Get 18% off all orders
Order now discount code: IndependenceDay
Click here to chat with us