Before identifying one’s perfect position in an organization, it is vital to put to consideration his or her weaknesses and strengths. These have to be compared with the particular leadership style they have or intend to use. As a student in a higher institution of learning, self evaluation will take precedence. In doing self-evaluation it requires one to be open and earnest to their values and views. These will clearly draw guide lines and enable growth and development of one’s particular leadership style. In doing self assessment, six areas will be put to focus this will follow vivid interpretation and analysis. The analysis will clearly reveal the strengths and weaknesses an individual bears hence defines the suitable leadership style. Ivancevich M. John & Matteson T. Michael (1996)
In self evaluation one has to ask himself a series of questions, first and foremost they have to know what leadership style they possess. This has to be in the broad picture of an organization’s vision and mission statement. Besides, it should have an element of building team spirit and development of unique leadership skills. It is evident that an organization that exhibits harmony prospers drastically than one which is at wrangles most of the time. Hellriegel D. & Slocum W. J. (1982)
-
0
Preparing Orders
-
0
Active Writers
-
0%
Positive Feedback
-
0
Support Agents
Secondly, they have to know their level of charisma. One who is highly charismatic is definitely influential, has confidence in themselves. Besides, holding strong character and being enthusiastic about what they believe in and this is what draws people to them.
Thirdly, they need to ask themselves whether they trust others, one has to have a high score in this area since any ideology or growth of a business will depend on the support they get from others. Those who are working within the organization are a prerequisite to develop an understanding and a level of trust that will make the organization to flourish. Having less trust in people will definitely distort team work of the organization. If we trust other people we empower them with tasks and responsibilities with a mutual understanding of workers towards the leadership development. Ivancevich M. John & Matteson T. Michael (1996)
Another important factor is to know whether others trust you. This will either ruin the morale or boost your confidence when deliberating upon issues. If others trust you then they obey and follow the instructions, a low score in this particular area is detrimental to the business and might instigate poor leadership styles i.e. dictatorial leadership where diplomacy would have worked best. Therefore, it is important that leaders are trusted by those that they lead, and are able to carry out discipline on fair and leveled ground. Hellriegel D. & Slocum W. J. (1982)
The other question that one has to ask when doing self evaluation is how good they are at others. A high score in this area will indicate that they have extremely good skills in instilling discipline as well as imposing it. Effective discipline follows a gradual and systematic procedure. There should be a warning issued to a defaulter and this should be done timely not to be carried forward and presented when it is long overdue. This will help arrest the anomaly before it escalates and causes irreparable effects to the organization or business entity. A leader needs to have a serious yet calm tone when addressing the problem. This should not in any way involve personal feelings and should recognize high ethical values. However worse the mistake appear, it has to fall in certain lines of mitigation. Ivancevich M. John & Matteson T. Michael (1996)
Lastly, one should be able to know how good they are at team leadership. This is the final stage of self evaluation and it develops behavior and enhances team development and management at different levels namely: the conforming stage, storming stage and eventually the performing stage of the organization. Hellriegel D. & Slocum W. J. (1982)
There are different leadership theories; when compared and contrasted, the transformational theory is perceived as the best. It is an intrinsic factor behind the big achievers as they are motivated by this leadership strategy. Through modern ways of selling out a commodity or an ideology, advertising has been vastly utilized. This follows a well of experience and expertise which eventually leads to invention and innovation in adding value to the organization or business entity. Hellriegel D. & Slocum W. J. (1982)
Conclusion;
In conclusion, understanding the weaknesses and strengths as reflected in the self evaluation, reveals that a leader is people friendly and is focused to efficiency, high production and comfort of the employees. This kind of leader is regarded with high leadership abilities, holds high regard for ethics and values and is highly trusted. As one continues to delegate and empower others in enabling them to be the best they can be will enable him to become the best managers and leaders they can be. Greenberg J. & Baron A. R. (1997)