The literature review on my research topic based on inclusion and education was thorough and complete. Good review of literature requires a thorough research on previous studies and the findings linked to the current study. My literature review identified gaps that needed redress in the present research. This gave a strong basis in formulating the research questions and hypotheses.
The methodology was very suitable for the topic and the measures as well. Fundamentally, data was gathered using a survey instrument. Surveys instruments have a clear-cut benefit to the investigator having a goal of giving an explanation of behaviors, attitudes, opinions or else specific population characteristics. A survey design provides the capacity to make an association of organs, set up existing attitudes as well as the assessment of applications. The relevance of a self-administered interview questionnaire outline as an evaluation tool was therefore a suitable approach for collecting data.
The most frustrating thing about research process is descriptive and inferential statistics. The data analysis utilized a bi-variate co-relational statistics in ascertaining all the study hypotheses which was very tasking. Statistics of an explanatory kind took into account the population mean and the standard deviation as well. These preceded inferential analysis of statistics to establish if the scores of the population were usually distributed. A lot of caution needed to be exercised generally.
-
0
Preparing Orders
-
0
Active Writers
-
0%
Positive Feedback
-
0
Support Agents
The most interested thing I found out was in getting the validity and reliability of my research work. The validity and reliability of the research tools made contribution to a thorough study of research that offered meaningful data and information that resulted into a strong analysis together with conclusions. It was therefore interesting how the research factors correlated so well in the study process in ensuring consistency.