The society is guided by laws and regulations that have been formulated to define the boundaries that one needs to observe so that order might be maintained. These laws and regulations are divided into different sections depending on the needs of the area that is being addressed. Following this point, there are specific laws and regulations that have been formulated to guide motorists on the road. With this in mind, one of the laws that have been formulated in the recent past is the Kyleigh’s Law that is meant to help the police to identify motorists under the age of 21 years who are found violating traffic laws (Megerian 2010).
To begin with, the Kyleigh’s Law was formulated after the death of a 16 year old teenager named Kyleigh D’Alessio in a car accident. Therefore, in reference to Megerian (2010), all the New Jersey drivers under 21 years old with probationary licenses will need to place the decals on the upper left corner of the front and rear license plates. It is argued that with decals on the license plates, the police officers would identify these teenagers easily. As a result, any teenager that is involved in crime or rather violation of traffic rules would easily be recognized.
In spite of the fact a lot of people have proposed that this law needs to be enacted, there are a lot of arguments against its implementation. Instead, this law needs to be reversed. There are various reasons that have been cited against this law. To begin with, it is argued that thieves and stockers have targeted the young people as these are easy to rob. Similarly, these youth fancy expensive goods such as jewelry and therefore, while these decals can help police officers to identify youths that violate traffic laws, they would contribute to these youth being targeted by criminals as they are easily identifiable. According to Haak (2010), in the 1990s, Florida’s rental cars all had license plates with a Y or Z on them, so criminals would target those cars for robberies and other nefarious crimes.
Another reason that has been cited that raises eyebrows as to why the Kyleigh’s Law need to be reexamined before being implemented is the fact that there is no guarantee that once a person was over the age of 21 years, such a person would be responsible (Koroknay-Palicz 2010). Whereas the proponents of this law argues that there would be increased safety since it would be easier to control youth behaviors on the road, it is not automatic that once a person was over the age of 21 years, such a person would be mature enough to observe safety procedures on the road. In fact, one can argue that age is a number and it does not necessarily portray a sense of maturity in a person.
In addition, these stickers needed to be bought at a price of $4 each. However, some youths were not able to pat with this amount of cash and therefore worked out on getting them using other unethical means. For instance, there were reported cases of stolen decals by young people under the age of 21 years. Therefore, whereas it was mandatory for them to have these decals, there were high chances that they would end up spending more on them due to the fact that they could be stolen easily and used on other vehicles (Megerian 2010).
In summation, Kyleigh’s license plate decals law should be reversed as it raises a lot of controversial issues in terms of what needs to be achieved by this law as opposed to its effects on young people. To begin with, security reasons top the list of why this law should be reversed. It is important to understand that decals expose the youth to the dangers of being targeted by criminals. These decals could also be stolen easily. In addition, there is no proof that people over the age of 21 years were more careful on the road than those below the age of 21 years.