Hinckley John was born in the year 1955, in Oklahoma. Unlike the majority of children his babyhood was unique. He went to Texas when he was four years old. His recreational activities encompassed playing basketball and quarterbacking football. In his adulthood, Hinckley got interested in music, as well as to be identified with Lennon John. In actual fact, his social status was lost the moment Hinckley together with his family moved to a well-known neighborhood in Dallas (Meyer et al., 2009). In this paper, someone has to choose a case study in the “Abnormal Behavior Textbook.” In doing so, it has selected “The Case of John Hinckley,” and thus, this paper will do the following: give a succinct overview of Hinckley John’s case; and elucidate the behavioral, genetic, cognitive, and poignant components of the critiqued disorder.
Hinckley John’s Case: Overview
On 31st March, 1981, Hinckley John tried to snuff Reagan Ronald, the then President of the United States. The majority of individuals, encompassing President Ronald, were critically injured. Hinckley stated that the major reason for doing that was to make an impact on Foster Jodie, a movie star, with whom John Hinckley was in obsession with. In the year 1982, the case of Hinckley John was put to trial, in which he was faced with 13 different charges. Later on, he was found innocent by the insanity reason (Meyer et al., 2009).
Subsequently, Hinckley John was forced to commit himself to Saint Elizabeth Hospital that is situated in the Washington D.C., where he still remains up to now. As a matter of fact, the public was shocked by this verdict and thus, this led to an enormous re-writing of the defense laws of insanity. Altogether, the insanity defense was dropped by a number of states. Similarly, other states tightened not only the impacts of the verdict, but also the wants to claim the defense (LawSERVER, 2008).
After the trial and in the next subsequent weeks, twenty-six separate bills were instituted with the aim of modifying the federal decree, which covered the lunacy protection. To that effect, two vital alterations were made to the federal law with regards to the worry of criminal accountability. To begin with, the alluring impulse notion was eliminated from the Initial McNaughten model, and secondly, the burden-of-proof, which demonstrated the psychological state of the defendant’s practicability, was moved from prosecution to defense. As a result, the needed conviction level of jury when scrutinizing the available proof was reduced (Meyer et al., 2009).
In view of the fact that there were significant alterations in the federal law, they only acted as state-court models, which are capable of hearing the majority of lunacy defenses on a yearly basis. Idyllically, the second data set that is of most relevance is the history of an individual’s mental health before he/she commits a criminal activity. On the other hand, the data set that is of least relevance is the mental status of an individual during the process of evaluation. In most circumstances, this individual’s mental status is usually focused by mental health specialists due to their availability. However, a number of factors, such as an individual to have already been given psychometric medication are likely to contaminate this data (Dietz, 2009).
Hinckley is still receiving medication at St. Elizabeth Hospital. His release will depend on the recommendation of the Hospital the moment it perceives that, the community is no longer threatened by Hinckley. In fact, it is clear that the mental syndrome symptoms Hinckley had were reduced by psychotropic-medications, and thus it is not easy for the hospital to create a recommendation of the kind. This can be in view of the fact that his recent years has relatively been with no considerable blemish in comparison to previous years, in which the materials were provided in plenty by Hinckley John, while arguing why he was being retained in the hospital.
The behavioral, genetic, cognitive, and poignant components of the critiqued disorder
The approach that Hinckley used to try to snuff President Reagan was violent, and of absurd viciousness. In fact, many queries were raised with regards to the steadiness, psychosomatic inspiration, and history of John Hinckley, because he was deemed to very emotional, and this facet maybe genetic or cognitive. After the trial that lasted seven weeks, Hinckley asserted that he aimed at capturing the admiration and affection of Foster Jodie, a movie state and student in Yale University. This illustrates a cognitive approach.
Despite the fact that Hinckley John did not achieve his ultimate objective, his behavior was the base for substantial alterations in the statues of criminal accountabilities at the state/federal level. In the year 1978, Hinckley showed interest in the Nazi movement of the United State. He then bought a firearm in 1979 and started publishing the ‘American Front Newsletter’ (Meyer et al., 2009).This demonstrates a cognitive component of the disorder. Ideally, he authorized himself to be the American Front Director, in which thirty-seven states fabricated their membership.
By then, his movement was seventeen times in comparison to the time he was at high school. This illustrated behavioral, genetic, cognitive, and poignant components of the critiqued disorder. Since high-school, sixty pounds had been gained by Hinckley and thus, was anxious. This made him to purchase another gun. This illustrates poignant, cognitive, and behavioral components of the disorder.
After learning the program of President Reagan, he wrote a final affection letter, specifically to Foster Jodie. Consequently, his gun was loaded with Devastator bullets and then commenced his vigilance outside Hilton Hotel in the Washington D.C. In an instance of time, Hinckley John had planned to obtain glory and thus enacting his affection to Foster Jodie (Meyer et al., 2009). This illustrated behavioral, genetic, cognitive, and poignant components of the critiqued disorder.